Peace Like A River


It was a wide river, mistakable for a lake or even an ocean unless you'd been wading and knew its current. Somehow I'd crossed it... Now I saw the stream regrouped below, flowing on through what might've been vineyards, pastures, orhards... It flowed between and alongside the rivers of people; from here it was no more than a silver wire winding toward the city. - Leif Enger, Peace Like A River

Thursday, April 20, 2006

The toll in Balochistan

The Daily Times tallies up the results of the violence in Balochistan that erupted in earnest last December.

Violence in Balochistan has claimed 158 lives since January 1, sources quoted Interior Minister Aftab Ahmed Sherpao as telling the last cabinet meeting on law and order, with a special focus on the ongoing insurgence in Balochistan.

Of the dead, 53 were civilians and 33 personnel of law enforcement agencies, the sources quoted the minister as saying. He added that 72 rebel tribesmen (BLA men) were killed and 41 injured. He said that 147 people had also been injured since January 1.

Sherpao told the cabinet that Dera Bugti, Kohlu and Khuzdar were the main troubled districts where security personnel, government installations and infrastructure were being targeted, the sources said.

“Though incidents of rocket attacks, small arm fires and mine blasts targeting government installations have decreased considerably, there has been an upsurge in violence for the last one week because of the proscription of the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and cancellation of arms licences to sardars,” the minister said.

However, Sherpao said that the overall capability of the BLA had weakened and the process of rehabilitation of displaced Kalpar, Rahija and Masori tribesmen had been completed.

The BLA was banned on April 7, while arms licences to Baloch leaders including Nawab Akbar Bugti, Senator Sanaullah Baloch and Akhtar Mengal had been cancelled.

Sherpao told the cabinet that the insurgency in Balochistan and Talibanisation in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) could hamper economic activity in the country, sources said.


In contrast with President Musharraf's puzzling comments on Monday, Minister Sherpao acknowledged that the insurgency could have an impact on economic activity. With attacks on gas pipelines, and power and water facilities, Pakistan is indeed concerned.

In the long term, there are hopes that pipelines could run from Iran and Central Asia through Afghanistan and possibly Balochistan to Pakistan, and perhaps China and India. These projects would be less likely if the pipes were vulnerable to guerrilla attacks.

Rather than with violence, it would be far better for both sides if the issues could be resolved through talks such as these:

A joint committee of the provincial assembly has initiated dialogue between the government and Nawab Akbar Bugti to resolve the Balochistan issue. Balochistan Minister for Culture and Tourism Syed Shair Jan said the committee, led by Chief Minister Jam Muhammad Yousaf, had faith in dialogue to reach a consensus on the Balochistan issue. He claimed the committee had made progress to develop contacts with Bugti. The minister criticised some parliamentarians and civilians for trying to sabotage the ongoing dialogue process. He said the committee would continue efforts to bring the two parties on the dialogue table so that the Balochistan issue is resolved peacefully. He rebuffed the demand regarding invitation to any other country to the dialogue between the government and Bugti. Earlier, a parliamentary committee had been formed to look into the problems in Balochistan. In its interim report, the committee had recommended the withdrawal of the Frontier Constabulary (FC) and the Coast Guard from interior Balochistan, clearance of gas royalty arrears, abolition of the Concurrent List, a review of the National Finance Commission (NFC) award, provincial autonomy and the development of gas-rich areas.


The recommendations listed above would go a long ways in bringing peace to that province. In turn, as have the Kurds, the Balochs may find it best to enjoy some measure of autonomy, rather than complete independence, in return for ceasing the insurgency.

For its part, Pakistan would have to provide Balochistan with a greater share of the revenues generated by the natural resources there, and would have to cease the human rights violations.

Previous Posts

More unrest in SE Iran
The growing civil war in Baluchistan
Roundup of events in Balochistan
Iran hits back
The Port of Gwadar
Roundup of events in Balochistan
The Government of Balochistan in Exile

3 Comments:

  • At Thu Apr 20, 05:19:00 PM, Govt. of Balochistan said…

    There are two camps of people in Balochistan; one group believes that an independent Balochistan state is the only way to resolve Baloch grievances, and the other group believes that partial autonomy is an acceptable compromise.

    Ever since the occupation of Balochistan, the people from the former camp are either in prisons, executed, or exiled. Hence, the people from the latter camp have prevailed in the political scene of Balochistan throughout its period of occupation.

    After years of subjugation, the Baloch masses have learned a valuable lesson that the occupying forces have no interest in developing Balochistan. Their interest lies in usurping the natural resources and strategic location to strengthen their own position (to oppress the Baloch). No wonder why the former group is receiving so much support from the Baloch masses in recent days.

    I believe that the occupiers of Balochistan are not sincere, and their rhetoric has always been the same that they are oppressing the Baloch nationalists for the good of Balochistan. In reality, it is the occupiers who have hurt the Baloch people the most, not the nationalists. Peace can only prevail in Balochistan if it gains its independence.

    Mir Azaad Khan Baloch
    General Secretary
    The Government of Balochistan in Exile

     
  • At Fri Apr 21, 12:12:00 PM, Jeff said…

    Thanks for your viewpoint. Indeed, the government of Pakistan would need to make sharp changes. Making people "disppear" is hardly a sign of a government that could definitely be trusted to respect autonomy.

    In musing about autonomy, I was thinking in terms of cost. If the Balochs could achive real autonomy, and enjoy almost all the same benefits of independence, but at far less cost in terms of lives, etc..., would that be better in the long run?

    Certainly, hard for me to judge when I'm halfway around the world.

     
  • At Fri Apr 21, 09:54:00 PM, Govt. of Balochistan said…

    Since the occupation of Balochistan, the Baloch had hoped to gain provincial autonomy instead of total independence. But, the Pakistanis were not sincere, and they have systematically marginalized the Baloch, both economically and politically. We have tried every means to reach a compromise, but to no avail. So, when someone is pushed to the wall with no way out, then they will fight. Hence, the Baloch are fighting for our rights and protesting the unjust economic and political system of Pakistan.

    Mir Azaad Khan Baloch
    General Secretary
    The Government of Balochistan in Exile

     

Post a Comment

<< Home