Peace Like A River


It was a wide river, mistakable for a lake or even an ocean unless you'd been wading and knew its current. Somehow I'd crossed it... Now I saw the stream regrouped below, flowing on through what might've been vineyards, pastures, orhards... It flowed between and alongside the rivers of people; from here it was no more than a silver wire winding toward the city. - Leif Enger, Peace Like A River

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Cervantes and the novel

This speech by writer Carlos Fuentes, entitled "In praise of the novel", was given at the Literature Festival Berlin, on September 6.

Fuentes talked about Cervantes' place in literature, looked at larger questions that fiction and literature can address. Fuentes acknowledged the enduring voice of Don Quixote.

Don Quixote was a big bestseller when it first appeared in 1605, and has continued to sell ever since, whereas William Faulkner was definitively a bad seller if you compare the meager sales of "Absalom, Absalom" (1936) to those of the really big-seller of the year, Hervey Allen's "Anthoy Adverse", a Napoleonic saga of love, war and trade.
...
Some writers achieve great popularity and then disappear forever. The bestseller lists of the past fifty years are, with a few lively exceptions, a somber graveyard of dead books. Yet permanence is not a wilful proposition. No one can write a book aspiring to immortality, for it would then court both ridicule and certain mortality. Plato puts immortality in perspective when he states that eternity, when it moves, becomes time, eternity being a kind of frozen time. And William Blake certainly brings things down to earth: Eternity is in love with the works of time.


I don't agree with Fuentes and his take on reality. The nature of reality and truth is a topic for another time, but I believe the most powerful fiction affects us precisely because it is a snapshot of reality.

Religion is dogmatic. Politics is ideological. Reason must be logical. But literature has the privilege of being equivocal. The quality of doubt in a novel is perhaps a manner of telling us that since authorship (and thus authority) are uncertain and susceptible of many explanations, so it goes with the world itself.

Reality is not fixed, it is mutable. We can only approach reality if we do not pretend to define it once and for all. The partial verities proposed by a novel are a bulwark against dogmatic impositions.


Fuentes does understand, though, the power of the novel:

Enter your own self and discover the world, the novelist tells us. But also, go out into the world and discover yourself.
...
I find, in all great novels, a human project, call it passion, love, liberty, justice, inviting us to actualize it to make it real, even if we know that it is doomed to fail.


This is what I was getting at when I wrote about patterns. In literature we see patterns we can overlay onto our own lives, and suddenly things make sense, we see meaning in the events of our lives.

4 Comments:

  • At Wed Sep 21, 01:46:00 AM, johngrif said…

    This is interesting reading. Those of us with a North American heritage are unfamiliar with so much of 'other' Americas' writing or history.

    I prefer simpler ways and explanations than these. I am not sure literature can be an end in itself or can explain itself.

    But I respond to Sr. Fuentes traditional "liberality," that is the broad Christian humanism that informs his opinions, the feeling which underlies Western art. His emotions are likewise mine.

    I especially like this passage wherein he acknowledges the "elephant in the room," that is the influence of modern technology.

    MTV, Ipod, the Internet, mass media have greatly disoriented the human condition, I would agree, as Fuentes says:

    -------
    Space has capitulated. Thanks to the image, we can be everywhere instantly. But time has pulverized, breaking down into images that are in danger of refusing us both the imagination of the past and the memory of the future. We can become the slaves of hypnotic images that we have not chosen. We can become cheerful robots amusing ourselves to death
    -----

    What then the future of the novel.
    Too many Western young people live in illiterate visual/aural barbarism, as 'cheerful robots amusing ourselves to death.'

    They lack the place or teachers to become human. One recent education professor put it this way, "Young people require the hands on involvement of adults. Uncared for as a unique individual, a child cannot survive."

    Today's techno world swallows young people and condemns them to a jungle, to be a thing manipulated by the educational establishment, apart from the parents (daycare through graduate school), alien to the community, with no sense of identity as a child, no sense that they are the reason for which home, church, and town in a central sense are created.

    The novel has been an important vehicle which permits modern man to seize the world and settle it.

    To seek understanding. It may be an instrument today's Western youth will never discover.

     
  • At Wed Sep 21, 07:40:00 AM, Paul said…

    So if Fuentes says, "Reality is not fixed, it is mutable," how can he justify saying, "Religion is dogmatic. Politics is ideological," in the previous paragraph? By his own logic, shouldn't he say "can be" or "sometimes is" instead of "is"? Or are religion and politics not part of reality anymore? If they're not, how does Fuentes know this, since, to him, reality is not fixed? There's a difference between reality and our perception of it. Changes in the latter don't necessarily imply changes in the former.

     
  • At Wed Sep 21, 09:51:00 AM, Jeff said…

    Paul, you noticed that too, eh? This is one important reason I think it is folly to start talking about reality being mutable. Once you do, you are disqualified from ever using the word "real" again. Further down, he writes "Literature makes real what history forgot." If reality is not fixed, that whatever literature is making, how is it of any lasting value? I understand what he's saying when he says "fiction invents what the world lacks", but again, when he says "I believe that these are realities that should move us to affirm that language is the foundation of culture", what reality does he think fiction defines? Is culture founded on shifting sands?

     
  • At Wed Sep 21, 09:55:00 AM, Jeff said…

    John, you wrote: "The novel has been an important vehicle which permits modern man to seize the world and settle it.

    To seek understanding. It may be an instrument today's Western youth will never discover."

    So well put. If you hadn't told me your work was education-related, I would've guessed it from that eloquent statement. Those who wish to teach are keenly aware of the value in learning from stories.

    Why do school have kids read things like Tom Sawyer, Shakespeare, etc...? It isn't simply to learn vocabularly. Children absorb the lessons about ourselves in these works.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home