There is no heart at the center of the Arab world
Fouad Ajami is a widely known Middle East scholar, one of the best. He was born in Lebanon, and is of Iranian Shiite ancestry. He has a brilliant column today at OpinionJournal.com, where he elucidates the Sunni-Shiite struggle, and how the situation in Iraq today illuminates the fact there is no pan-Arab brotherhood, there are just petty, despotic rulers.
Here are some snippets, but read it all.
(One of Ajami's books is entitled The Dream Palace of the Arabs, and is a clear-minded critique of the intellectual bankruptcy in the Middle East. Here is Daniel Pipes's review of the book.)
-----
Austin Bay mentions Ajami's column in the context of a Washington Post article about Zarqawi's role in Iraq.
Here are some snippets, but read it all.
The remarkable thing about the terror in Iraq is the silence with which it is greeted in other Arab lands. Grant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi his due: He has been skilled at exposing the pitilessness on the loose in that fabled Arab street and the moral emptiness of so much of official Arab life. The extremist is never just a man of the fringe: He always works at the outer edges of mainstream life, playing out the hidden yearnings and defects of the dominant culture. Zarqawi is a bigot and a killer, but he did not descend from the sky. He emerged out of the Arab world's sins of omission and commission; in the way he rails against the Shiites (and the Kurds) he expresses that fatal Arab inability to take in "the other." A terrible condition afflicts the Arabs, and Zarqawi puts it on lethal display: an addiction to failure, and a desire to see this American project in Iraq come to a bloody end.
...
There is a cliché that distinguishes between cultures of shame and cultures of guilt, and by that crude distinction, it has always been said that the Arab world is a "shame culture." But in truth there is precious little shame in Arab life about the role of the Arabs in the great struggle for and within Iraq. What is one to make of the Damascus-based Union of Arab Writers that has refused to grant membership in its ranks to Iraqi authors? The pretext that Iraqi writers can't be "accredited" because their country is under American occupation is as good an illustration as it gets of the sordid condition of Arab culture. For more than three decades, Iraq's life was sheer and limitless terror, and the Union of Arab Writers never uttered a word. Through these terrible decades, Iraqis suffered alone, and still their poetry and literature adorn Arabic letters. They need no acknowledgment of their pain, or of their genius, from a literary union based in a city in the grip of a deadening autocracy.
...
Zarqawi's jihadists have sown ruin in Iraq, but they are strangers to that country, and they have needed the harbor given them in the Sunni triangle and the indulgence of the old Baathists. For the diehards, Iraq is now a "stolen country" delivered into the hands of subject communities unfit to rule. Though a decided minority, the Sunni Arabs have a majoritarian mindset and a conviction that political dominion is their birthright. Instead of encouraging a break with the old Manichaean ideologies, the Arab world beyond Iraq feeds this deep-seated sense of historical entitlement. No one is under any illusions as to what the Sunni Arabs would have done had oil been located in their provinces. They would have disowned both north and south and opted for a smaller world of their own and defended it with the sword. But this was not to be, and their war is the panic of a community that fears that it could be left with a realm of "gravel and sand."
(One of Ajami's books is entitled The Dream Palace of the Arabs, and is a clear-minded critique of the intellectual bankruptcy in the Middle East. Here is Daniel Pipes's review of the book.)
-----
Austin Bay mentions Ajami's column in the context of a Washington Post article about Zarqawi's role in Iraq.






1 Comments:
At Thu Sep 29, 10:27:00 AM, Anonymous said…
Ajimi comments are quite prescient. Indeed, since the rise of arab nationalism post ww2 (some scholars would say developed, in part, by the impetus of our buddy in the sand, El Lawrence himself! (what a guy, his books still are spot on and should be required reading) what has been confirmed time and again is that hundreds of tribes find extreme difficulty uniting, ironically instead of creating unity.
It is amusing it would be a Persia to point to this out and I am sure it would be dismissed out of hand by many Arabs if they found out its proveniance. Such parochial and insipid prejudices...
(And yet, truth be told, perhaps I too am picking up on these petty biases. I often immediately question; who is this guy, whats his tribe, religion and denomination, ethnicity etc. Sad in a way yet necessary)
I was just talking to an elder Iraqi army type, educated in Britain confiding in me that all this violence was caused by "outsiders". We didnt have alot of time to elaborate, however, its a sentiment I have heard many many times. What he may have been referring to was the foreign fighters who are behind most of the suicide type attacks and related attempts at fomenting civil war,
In short, another attempt to dissaude oneself of the reality and inevitibility of truth.
Post a Comment
<< Home